These unsavory topics used to be unacceptable even in “mixed company,” and remain upsetting to anyone with common decency (or is it uncommon now?).

Reader discretion is advised.

So much happening in the sexual landscape today that would horrify a normal, moral person: the noisy cultural and medical “leaders” encouraging transgenderism, the mainstreaming of homosexuality and pedophilia, the claim that children are “sexual from birth,” and the consequent explosion of child pornography and abuse (tip of the iceberg: the scandals of the Hunter Biden laptop and Disney’s openly perverting agenda [and Disney criminals, here]), and other deviances and debaucheries.

But these abominations did not spring forth whole onto the world just now. A long thread can be traced back to a dubious milestone: the publication of the most-cited books today on “human sexual behavior”, whose reports were clearly based on “scientific fraud and criminally derived data”: namely, Dr. Alfred Kinsey’s Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) / ——— in the Human Female (1953). (By the way, Kinsey was an entomologist.)

In launching his Playboy magazine, Hugh Hefner (who was a virgin at 20, as most people that age were at the time) had just read Kinsey and vowed to be the fake scientist’s “pamphleteer”. [More about Hefner in a future Substack.] The sexual revolution of the 1960s would also draw upon those same pseudoscientific findings for philosophical guidance. Indeed, “Kinsey built the superhighway to sexual freedom.”

The successes of the porn and depravity promoters in legalizing many acts once considered crimes, and forcing acceptance of sordid practices by a mostly resistant public lies in the coordinated cover-up by media and academe of the great fraud that was Kinsey and his “reports.” (Do scroll down to read The Kinsey Cover-up below.)

In stark contrast to the dark and vile world she wrote and spoke about, the late Dr Judith Reisman was a warm, radiant, and delightful person.

As a longstanding adversary of the “sex-industrial complex"(including years as a principal investigator for the Department of Justice—when the latter was still an honorable institution), Dr Reisman tirelessly did God’s work with courage and determination.

So, how did she get involved in investigating all these in the first place?

As she explains in an article (link below), it was a distressing family incident that started her on this path:

I lived at a wonderful time. My mother welcomed me home every day and my father supported anything I did. I was safe among neighbors, uncles or cousins due to the delightfully repressive influence of the time. I married, and the hedge of protection about my life was not breached until 1966 when my 10-year-old daughter was molested by a 13-year-old adored and trusted family friend. She told him to stop, but he persisted. He knew she would like it, he said, he knew from his father's magazines, Playboy, the only "acceptable" pornography of the time. The boy left the country a few weeks later [he fled with his family to Israel], after it came to light that my daughter was but one of several neighborhood children he had raped, including his own little brother. My heart was broken for all the families involved.
This appalling event in our lives, I would learn later, was a pattern with juvenile sex offenders, as they are known in law enforcement circles.
I might never have known anything about her violation, except that my daughter slipped into a deep depression. Only after I promised not to call the police would she talk about what happened. After assuring her this was not her fault, I called my dependable, staid aunt who listened sympathetically and declared, "Well Judy, she may have been looking for this herself. Children are sexual from birth." Stunned, I replied that my child was not seeking sex, and called my Berkeley school chum, Carole, who counseled, "Well Judy, she may have been looking for this herself. You know children are sexual from birth." I wondered at this same locution from two such different people so separated geographically. I recognized an ideological "party line." I did not know it then, but as a young mother, I had entered the world according to Kinsey. I would hear and read that "children are sexual from birth" often again. But finally I would uncover the hidden circumstances surrounding its source.

READ THE REST: A Personal Odyssey to the Truth by Judith A. Reisman

A fairly healthy woman in her mid-80s, her unexpected death early last year shocked many (and it was most likely due to the cv shots she took).

NOTE: This piece attempts to honor Dr Reisman’s remarkable deeds and accomplishments spanning several decades. The post might seem a tad much, with the many links and videos below; yet it’s only a small sampling of her sizable work. Readers need not consume it all in one go, and are encouraged to return at a later date to read or view the rest of the post.

Remembering Judith Reisman (April 11, 1935 -April 9, 2021) on the first anniversary of her death.

Until her untimely death on April 9, 2021 Dr. Judith Reisman was a lifelong champion for the rights of children. For decades she dedicated her life to combat the increasingly accepted and abhorrent ideology that children are sexual from birth, that they have a right to experience sexual pleasure whenever and with whomever they want, that purity is a false value. She was fully committed to do everything she could to protect childhood innocence, and to do so, she took direct aim at Alfred Kinsey and his self-proclaimed pamphleteer, Hugh Hefner. At one point Playboy sued a TV station in the Netherlands for libel for airing Dr. Reisman’s accusations that Playboy had published child pornography. Dr. Reisman prevailed.
She never stopped going after Kinsey, Playboy, the porn industry, big pharma, and the entire sex-industrial complex. She stood almost alone for years before she began creating a network of allies who came to see the seriously flawed foundation, Kinsey’s twin works on the Sexual Behavior in the Human Male and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Millions of dollars were behind Kinsey’s research and billions were, and are, behind the expansive sex industry. Those deep pockets were loath to give up any ground because of a single voice speaking against them. Before she came along, the big money from the giant foundations and big businesses were able to silence or crush the occasional voice opposing the Kinsey narrative.

FULL ARTICLE → Remembering Judith Reisman

(Added on Edit:)

READ→ The Little Lady Who Brought Down Alfred Kinsey (Austin Ruse, Crisis Magazine, April 16, 2021)

Book TV interviewed Judith Reisman about her book, "Sexual Sabotage," which takes a critical look at the work of entomologist Alfred Kinsey. (10 mins)

Subtitle: “How One Man Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America”

Dr Reisman tells you a whole lot in just 10 minutes! (need to view on YouTube)

So, why do Kinsey and his pseudoscientific “reports” remain “respectable” and still cited so much today?

LEARN ABOUT: The Kinsey Coverup —

—refers to the paid efforts of the mass media and the Kinsey Institute scientific establishment lobby to hide the facts of child sex abuse and fraud as the basis of Kinsey's alleged "scientific data" on human sexuality. Spiking legislative investigations into these barbaric “scientific” crimes and Liam Neeson’s glossy portrayal of Kinsey in the 2004 Kinsey feature film, qualify as part of this 60 year plus cover-up. [emphasis added]
Below you'll find a brief history of various legal actions on this matter, links to actual sex crimes in the Kinsey Reports, The Kinsey Institute's responses, articles about the Kinsey movie and other related documents. We hope this information will pique your interest. If so, we will add more information on this revolutionary change agent over time.

GO TO PAGE with links→ Kinsey Cover-up

Dr Reisman speaking on “child pornography” (2016; 7:44 mins)

Dr Judith Reitman explains how child abuse is one of the biggest problems to come out of pornography.

”All pornography is homosexuality.”

Article by the late Judith Reisman and Mary McAlister:

(Shame was an effective social force that kept these acts out of normal people’s lives, that saw them as the immoral, repulsive, and evil entities that they were. Thus, the concept had to be divorced from the despicable acts by the promoters of perversion.)

Deconstructing Dignity by Eradicating Shame: The Pernicious Heritage of Alfred Kinsey in Humanum 2018 (Quarterly Review of the Pontifical John Paul II Institute)

// Introduction

Original shame, known already from the first chapters of the Bible, is a permanent element of culture and morality. It belongs to the very origins of the ethos of the human body…. A person of developed sensibility crosses the limit of that shame only with difficulty and inner resistance. —John Paul II
Is there not charms / By which the property of youth and maidhood / May be abused? Have you not read, Roderigo, / Of some such thing? —Shakespeare, Othello, the Moor of Venice, Act I, Scene I

Forty years before Pope Saint John Paul II articulated the spousal meaning of the body, establishing a framework for a renewed culture of life, an Indiana University zoologist named Alfred Kinsey infamously laid the framework for the emergence of the culture of death to which John Paul II was responding. John Paul II’s claim in his famous General Audience catecheses through the 1980s was that the dignity of the human person, male and female, was gracefully expressed in the personal significance of the body. Kinsey’s claim in the 1940s was that the most degrading, abusive, and exploitative sexual behavior imaginable was normal and natural for men and women. John Paul II’s appeal was to truth, “the splendor of truth” which lifted human reason to the threshold of transcendence. Kinsey’s appeal, as we will show below, was to a body of carefully manipulated lies packaged as scientific discoveries.

The direct aim of Kinsey’s work was to destigmatize pornography. From the Greek pornográph(os), literally “writing about harlots,” pornography is defined as “sexually explicit videos, photographs, writings, or the like, whose purpose is to elicit sexual arousal.”[1] With John Paul II (and Shakespeare) as cited above, we argue that pornography violates human instinctual feelings of shame, of violation, which are based on the reasonable fear of exposure to unknown, potentially dangerous persons and situations. But how does one measure the ethos of shame to which John Paul II refers, or at what point does one cross the limits of shame?

In the modern era such questions are posed as matters of science, whose findings inform the application of law and development of general moral norms. In 1998 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that law must be based “almost entirely” on “scientific subject matter.” The “scientific subject matter” upon which law has judged human sexuality since the 1950s has been based, not on genuine science, but on Kinsey’s pseudo-scientific attack on the sexual shame instinct, which created the intellectual scaffolding for the dismantling of legal norms proscribing non-marital sex and establishing the so-called “sexual revolution.” This article, very briefly, traces the elements of that scaffolding in Kinsey’s deceptive work and its malign influence.[2] //

READ the REST → Deconstructing Shame…

About the Catholic Church and the flawed John Jay Report:

LISTEN: → Interview of Dr Reisman with Catholic speaker/blogger Patrick Coffin

READ:→ Catholic Church's Reliance Upon Kinsey Pseudoscience in John Jay Report (What was wrong with the John Jay Report? [Deliberately Created Omissions?])

(Important read for anyone interested in the grave problems of homosexuality/pederasty within the Catholic Church )

************************************

CODA: How many readers were already familiar with Dr Reisman and her work?

Embarrassed to admit I’d not heard of her nor her work till recently.

She was ignored and sidelined by the PTBs, which was to be expected. But why was she ignored even by those who should have seen her as an ally against the well-funded, deviant sex and pornography colossus?

(Specifically—the bishops of the US Roman Catholic Church; however, the glaring omissions in the John Jay Report [see link above] clearly explain why!)

This post is an attempt to make her work in exposing vital, if repulsive, truths known to more people. When crafting battle plans, we first need to understand how we as a society got to this degenerate place we are in today.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Learn more about Dr Reisman’s great body of work (books, articles, interviews, white papers, lawsuits, etc):

CLICK→ THE REISMAN INSTITUTE

+ Eternal rest grant unto Dr Judith Reisman, O Lord. May perpetual light shine upon her. May her soul, through the mercy of God, rest in peace. Amen. +

Leave a comment

Share

Share Pèlerine’s Newsletter: Pilgrim on Earth

Subscribe now

Teresa's Impromptu Scribblings

Remembering JUDITH REISMAN on Her 1st Death…